Brandeis University, located in suburban Massachusetts, has somewhat unexpectedly found itself at the center of the debate over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. After the university decided to pull a bloody one-sided pro-Palestinian art exhibit that had been displayed on the campus, Israel supporters cheered while anti-Israel radicals came out to demonstrate.
Was Brandeis correct to shut down the artwork? New guest contributor "Mini-Me", a student at the university (and a familiar name on this site thanks to his many fine reader comments), checks in with a first-hand report:
The past few days have been quite interesting here at Brandeis University in Waltham, Massachusetts. For those who have not yet heard, Brandeis has recently been in the news as a result of the administration's decision to pull an art exhibition entitled “Voices of Palestine,” ending the scheduled two-week exhibition just four days in. The exhibition was not organized by the University, but rather by Lior Halperin, a Brandeis sophomore who is both Jewish and Israeli. To set the scene: the artworks were located in the school’s library, not in the on-campus prestigious Rose Art Museum. Also, because this was simply a class project, and not a school sponsored event, the exhibition, consisting of seventeen paintings by Palestinian children, was not publicized on campus. For this reason, neither I nor most other students actually saw the paintings in person. However, in an article by the Boston Globe’s article, three of the works are detailed as follows:"A bulldozer menaces a girl with ebony pigtails, who lies in a pool of blood. A boy with an amputated leg balances on a crutch, in a tent city with a Palestinian flag. A dove, dripping blood, perches against blue barbed wire."
According to the article, shortly after the works were hung Brandeis received up to a dozen complaints, and school officials reacted by taking down the art. Brandeis official Dennis Nealon explained the reasoning behind the University's actions: “It was completely from one side in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and we can only go based on the complaints we received…'People were saying: (a) what is this; (b) what is it trying to say; and (c) should there be some sort of balancing perspective here?"
While the majority of the student body is oblivious to the situation, some who are aware staged a protest on Saturday, which approximately fifty students attended, insisting the artworks stay. Art critic Tyler Green, one of those against removing the exhibition, stated on his Modern Arts Blog: “Memo to university officials: Art does not equal journalism. An art exhibit is not a newspaper story. It is not required to present ‘both sides’ of a story.”
I couldn’t disagree with him (or the views of the protesting students) more.
While I agree that artwork does not need to tell both sides of a story, I do strongly feel that an academic institution is responsible for telling both sides of a story. Brandeis, however, does not have in its possession paintings by Israeli children that depict Palestinians violently hurting or killing Israeli children. Consequently, Brandeis feels that it wouldn't be appropriate to display the Palestinian artwork without also exhibiting the opposing (Israeli) viewpoint.
When a university displays an art exhibition, the contents of the exhibition reflect upon the school. Brandeis is a Jewish-sponsored college. A Palestinian art exhibition that depicts children being tortured by Israeli soldiers not only distorts the truth, but it runs in contradiction with the beliefs at the basis of the school's origin and establishment. If Brandeis does not wish to be associated with the contents of such extremely politically-charged artwork, it should certainly have the right to pull the exhibition.
Halperin has since lent the 17 paintings to an Arab student organization at MIT, which plans on displaying them in the near future.
My Memo to MIT: Keep Em!
TheSolidSurfer.com comments: Mini Me, thank you for the excellent report and analysis. I fully agree with you - the Palestinian artwork is not a mere presentation of the Palestinian "side", but a blatant distortion of the truth that entirely contradicts Brandeis's founding values. Furthermore, presenting only one perspective of the conflict is quite dishonest intellectually, and I'm glad to hear the administration has had the good sense to recognize this. Now that Brandeis has made it's decision, I hope MIT goes even further and throws the art in the trash!
Hi Mini Me,
Great article!
I wonder if the pictures thamselves are are art. After all, what constitutes art? Is a front page newspaper photograph art? Most persons would say that it is not, as such a photograph is essentially an augmentation of a news story. The essential ingredient of "art" after all, is that art must, through visual or tactile sensation, produce a sensory experience on the part of the viewer. A newspaper photograph may produce an experience in the part of the viewer, but such experience is predominantly a psychological or emotional experience that relates to the newsworthy (hopefully) message or article (especially if it is political in nature) being transmitted.
It seems that the Brandeis photographs are more in the nature of a political poster than a work of art. Indeed, had the photographs been pasted, collage - like, onto a poster board, with red blood - like letters stating, "LIBERATE PALESTINE" smeared onto the collage, the message the photographs augment would crystallize. Simply because the message is implied and is not emperical in nature does not change the purpose of the photographs. The student in question should therefore not be permitted to hide behind the fact that the message is implied - his message was political - not artistic. Brandeis' administration, for that reason, had every right to request that the political nature of the presentation comply with school rules.
By the way...the fact that the pictures are being loaned to an MIT student supports the syllogism, above...as MIT is not known for its art...
Posted by: Verdant | May 08, 2006 at 04:16 PM
Verdant,
Those are some very good points. Unfortunately not all is well at Brandeis, though, as Tony Kushner (an anti-Zionist and Steven Spielberg's screenwriting partner for the "Munich" movie) is set to be the graduation speaker this year: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=22362
Maybe if enough people protest to the administration, though, something can be done.
Posted by: Solid Surfer | May 08, 2006 at 08:44 PM
I think Kushner is just getting an honorary degree...I believe Prince El Hassan bin Talal of Jordan is the keynote speaker at commencement. However giving Kushner anything from Brandeis is insanely hypocritical. They must as well leave the artwork up in the library if they are gonna give this guy a degree. That link you gave says it all as it gives some of his quotes and stances.
Posted by: Mini Me | May 08, 2006 at 08:59 PM
Just as minor note, according to Brandeis' website, the commencment speaker is not Tony Kushner but rather Prince El Hassan bin Talal of Jordan. The truth is, I don't know Talal's politics so I can't say its any better than Kushner. Never the less, it should be an interesting speech. Brandeis is trying to be at the forefront of Middle East Studies (see the creation of the Crown Center)but is struggling to find an identity. It is interesting that the Center's mission statement states that, "The center will seek to produce a discourse on the Middle East as dispassionate, objective and centrist as possible." Is showing children's paintings without any context or history reflective of this mission? I certainly don't think so...
I was just forwarded the following e-mail. It is a letter from a Brandeis Proffesor (i'm going to leave out his name) to Brandeis University President Jehuda Reinhartz. Perhaps it can stir some more debate:
> dear jehuda,
>
> this is a difficult letter for me to write, but i feel compelled to
> write it. although i did not see the exhibit, and did not have any
> students complain directly to me about their presence, based on what i
> do know, i believe that it was wrong to take down the exhibit. along
> with most of the faculty members at the chairs' meeting on thursday, i
> found it ironic that the pictures were removed as the administration
> shared with us a new diversity statement, which includes statements
> about "engag[ing] members of our community as active citizens in a
> multicultural world," a document that claimed claims that the
> University "believes that diverse background and ideas are crucial to
> academic excellence" and "endeavors to foster a just and inclusive
> campus society that embraces the diversity of the larger society." I
> am certain that the exhibit would have been more suitable had a context
> been offered, but the absence of content was not, to my mind, a
> sufficient reason to remove it. i believe, in contrast to the
> statement provided through the office of communication, that removing
> the exhibit was censorship. We can (and should) debate if it was
> proper or improper censorship, but it is disingenuous to suggest that
> it was not censorship.
>
> i am deeply troubled that we will have to live with the ramifications
> of this decision for a long time. i hope that serious consideration
> will be given to proposals of how we might recover from this error, and
> thought will be given to constructive suggestions that were made at the
> chairs' meeting and elsewhere. These include the idea that we have
> serious discussions next year about the rights of community members to
> post on campus material that some find offensive, and that we have an
> art show showing various sides of the issue of how children understand
> the conflict. in any case, i hope that you realize the extent to which
> many faculty are very upset at the decision to remove the exhibit. i
> hope that the admistration, working with others, will find some way to
> turn this difficult situation into a constructive one.
>
> with best wishes--and of course i would welcome an opportunity to
> discuss this with you and others should you so wish.
>
Posted by: Ian | May 08, 2006 at 09:22 PM
My wife went to Brandeis and she's very disturbed by what has taken place there. The selling out of Zionist ideals to embrace leftwing pro-Palestinian dogma is deplorable.
Posted by: Mad Zionist | May 08, 2006 at 10:27 PM
I will post an interview tonight for you solid surfer. I apologize for the freudian slip with the silver surfer. However interviewing cartoon charachters could be a blast.
I was surprised at how many people have heard of the silver surfer.
Posted by: Beakerkin | May 09, 2006 at 06:27 AM
Mini Me and Ian - thanks for correcting my mistake; glad to hear Kushner isn't the graduation speaker. Even so, though, I think it's outrageous that the university has chosen to honor him in any fashion.
Posted by: Solid Surfer | May 09, 2006 at 07:25 PM
Beak - no worries...I actually hadn't heard of the Silver Surfer myself, but will have to check it out!
Posted by: Solid Surfer | May 09, 2006 at 07:28 PM
I haven't really read any Silver Surfer comics as I am too young for them but I know my father was a big fan!
Posted by: Mini Me | May 09, 2006 at 11:50 PM
For those interested in viewing the Palestinian artwork:
http://blogs.wbur.org/arts/index.php/2006/05/artscast-nine-censored-art/
Posted by: Neil Stirk | May 12, 2006 at 07:19 AM
That first piece shows exactly what the Palestinians are aiming for - the whole state of Israel. The leftists who refuse to believe this are totally deluded from reality.
Posted by: Solid Surfer | May 12, 2006 at 04:20 PM
You are able to seriously generate a very good initially impression on every person any time you are getting into a room, in case you have on some really attractive pieces of jewelry. You ought to shell out shut interest to those practical ideas and rely on them, to make sure that you can learn one of the simplest ways to pick jewellery.
When working with harsh chemical substances like cleaning goods, performing laundry, or taking a bath you'll want to constantly take out your jewelry. To clean your jewellery you must use heat water using a delicate soap, rinse it off, then polish your jewellery having a jewelry polish and dry in advance of placing it back again into storage.
On the subject of demonstrating off your character as a result of jewellery, most of the time you'll be able to make a bigger assertion with much less. Opt for bold, remarkable items, but limit on your own to sporting one or two at a time. A innovative pair of chandelier earrings can set off an outfit on it's Ugg Canada Sale
very own, and occasionally a flashy cocktail ring could be the only glitz you need to draw consideration.
You should not don your jewelry when you strategy on likely for just a swim or if you plan on going in any other physique of water that may comprise harsh chemicals. These types of things could cause your jewellery to age substantially far more promptly. Defend your jewellery and be conscientious.
When you've got Cheap Uggs
very good jewellery or heirloom jewellery whose value you must shield by means of insurance coverage, it really is smart to just take superb photographs of those items and to have an appraisal done by an expert. Make certain the footage you are taking are great, excellent types. Making use of a flash when taking these footage will never trigger very good footage of your jewelry. It's best to seize an image of your respective treasured jewelry less than delicate, diffused fluorescent bulbs.
To include a wonderful volume of flair to any outfit merely create one statement bit of jewellery. Whether or not it be considered a massive ring, some bold earrings, a thick bracelet, or a chunky necklace, adding an announcement piece to any outfit will never only carry it out of the regular but may also ensure it is far more 'you'. In addition, a statement piece is absolutely sure to make a terrific conversation starter in any event.
Posted by: Royaveerype | December 13, 2011 at 12:21 AM
You'll be able to really make a fantastic very first impression on everyone whenever you are getting into a room, in case you have on some definitely gorgeous pieces of jewellery. You ought to pay out close attention to these practical guidelines and use them, in order that you'll explore the best way to choose jewellery.
When doing work with harsh chemicals like cleansing products and solutions, doing laundry, or using a shower you need to always take out your jewelry. To scrub your jewelry you ought to use warm drinking water with a delicate soap, rinse it off, then polish your jewelry by using a jewelry polish and dry previous to putting it again into storage.
When it comes to demonstrating off your character as a result of jewellery, more often than not you can produce a much larger statement with a lot less. Pick out bold, dramatic items, but limit all by yourself to donning one or two at a time. A sophisticated pair of chandelier earrings can set off an outfit on it truly is ugg boots sale
have, and at times a flashy cocktail ring could be the only glitz you would like to draw consideration.
You should not have on your jewellery should you method on heading to get a swim or when you plan on heading in any other system of h2o that could have harsh substances. These kinds of things can cause your jewelry to age substantially more easily. Guard your jewelry and be conscientious.
When you've got uggs on sale
fine jewelry or heirloom jewellery whose worth you would like to safeguard through insurance coverage, it truly is smart to get fantastic footage of those pieces and also to have an appraisal carried out by an expert. Be certain the photographs you take are good, excellent ones. Applying a flash when using these footage is not going to bring about excellent photos of one's jewellery. It's best to capture a picture of one's precious jewelry below delicate, diffused fluorescent bulbs.
To add an ideal number of flair to any outfit basically add one particular statement piece of jewellery. Whether or not it be considered a significant ring, some daring earrings, a thick bracelet, or maybe a chunky necklace, incorporating a statement piece to any outfit will not only carry it from the normal but will also allow it to be extra 'you'. In addition, a statement piece is absolutely sure to create an excellent conversation starter in any occasion.
Posted by: Royaveerype | December 14, 2011 at 12:11 AM
The complete mulberry discounted ,One,S] purses together with Yahoo.co.jp spring as well as summertime in order to be every amazement to help discounted mulberry bags fanatic. There are plenty various kinds of low cost purses have been getting marketed pertaining to Wordpress.org Approach Weak. Various kinds as well as other safe-keeping measurements reproduction discounted mulberry bags counseled me established. Some of Qq.com purses and handbags continuous this kind of hang out thirty day period or perhaps calendar year several made loads of changes. A high level discounted mulberry ,One,S] carrier fan, you could see definitely not just One ladies handbag, though a number of to meet one particular within Google.ca returning summer time and also early spring.
Posted by: Wynes7Vugteveen | January 28, 2012 at 01:06 AM